4.6 Article

Use of organic bulk-heterojunction solar cells as selective contacts in wide band-gap perovskite solar cells: advantages and limitations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 24, 页码 13979-13985

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta03156b

关键词

-

资金

  1. ICINN [PID2019-109389RB-I00]
  2. AGAUR [SGR-2017SGR00978]
  3. China Scholarships Council [2019-08140093]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21671124]
  5. Fujian Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2020J06046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of the kinetics of perovskite/organic photovoltaic interfaces with different perovskite I/Br ratios and PM6:Y6 blends. Through time resolved spectroscopy, we investigated carrier extraction and recombination kinetics to understand charge dynamics, which allowed us to foresee important differences in the perovskite internal electric field reorganization and the influence of electronic charge accumulation on performance.
Our work analyses for the first time the kinetics of perovskite/organic photovoltaic (OPV) interfaces with different perovskite I/Br ratios (MAPbI(3-x)Br(x), x = 0, 1, 2, and 3) and PM6:Y6 as a bulk heterojunction blend. The aim was to study in depth the combination of a wide band gap perovskite material - that allows large open-circuit voltage - and the PM6:Y6 thin film that accounts for large photocurrents in organic photovoltaics (OPV). Studies of carrier extraction and carrier recombination kinetics, using time resolved spectroscopy under operando conditions, have been performed to understand the charge dynamics in these cells. Comprehension of the processes in this perovskite solar cell configuration allowed us to foresee important differences in the reorganization of the perovskite internal electric field depending on its composition and how the performance is influenced by different degrees of accumulation of electronic charges at selective contacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据