4.2 Article

Properties of Self-compacting Concrete Produced with Biomass Wood Ash

期刊

TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 495-502

出版社

UNIV OSIJEK, TECH FAC
DOI: 10.17559/TV-20200214103332

关键词

biomass wood ash; durability; fresh and hardened properties; self-compacting concrete

资金

  1. Ministry for Science and Technology, Republic of Serbia [TR 36017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass wood ash can be used as a partial replacement for coal fly ash in producing self-compacting concrete, enhancing viscosity and preventing segregation and bleeding, albeit slightly decreasing flowability. Additionally, it has no significant impact on the mechanical strength and durability of concrete, but increases drying shrinkage.
The demand of the contemporary society for renewable energy sources lead to the increase of the bio-power plants. Accordingly, the amount of ash generated by burning the biomass is increased, and its disposal becomes a large environmental problem. The paper presents the research of potential use of biomass wood ash as a partial replacement for coal fly ash (10%, 20%, 30% and 40% of mass) in production of self-compacting concrete (SCC). The effects of biomass wood ash on the properties of SCC in fresh and hardened states have been examined, as well as on the properties of durability. Test results indicated that the biomass wood ash slightly reduces the flowability and passing ability of SCC, while its addition enhances the viscosity of SCC and significantly prevents segregation and bleeding. SCCs with the contents of biomass wood ash up to 20% have approximately same mechanical strength as the reference mixture. Biomass wood ash has no negative effect on the resistance of concrete to the action of water under pressure, but a decrease of freeze/thaw resistance with de-icing salt is detected as its contents increases. The addition of biomass wood ash into SCC increases the drying shrinkage in the initial period of drying (up to 14 days), and it is decreased in a later phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据