4.7 Article

Atomically dispersed Pd-Ru dual sites in an amorphous matrix towards efficient phenylacetylene semi-hydrogenation

期刊

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
卷 57, 期 46, 页码 5670-5673

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cc00923k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0901600]
  2. NSF of China [21905292, 21872166]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan [20dz1204400]
  4. Key Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-T06, QYZDJ-SSW-JSC013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a method for optimizing the conversion and selectivity of noble metal-based catalysts in the semi-hydrogenation reaction by dispersing Pd and Ru in an amorphous zirconium hydrogen phosphate matrix. The highly diluted noble metals can act as dual single-atom sites in oxides, with both conversion and selectivity exceeding 90%. In situ DRIFT-IR results show the rapid generation of surface hydroxyl groups, indicating the high efficiency of the single-atom sites in dissociating bound H-2. This work provides a scalable approach for producing cost-effective single-atom catalysts extendable to various oxide matrices.
Optimizing the active sites to balance the conversion and selectivity of the target reaction has long been a challenging quest in developing noble metal-based catalysts. By dispersing Pd and Ru in an amorphous zirconium hydrogen phosphate matrix cross-linked by ionic inorganic oligomers, highly diluted noble metal (<0.2 mol%) can be utilized as dual single-atom sites in oxides for the semi-hydrogenation of phenylacetylene with optimized conversion and selectivity (both >90%) to styrene. In situ DRIFT-IR results suggested the fast generation of surface hydroxyl groups during the catalytic reaction, indicating the high efficiency of the single-atom sites to dissociate bound H-2. This work provides an easily scaled-up method for the production of cost-effective single-atom catalysts extendable to various oxide matrices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据