4.5 Article

Cross-oncopanel study reveals high sensitivity and accuracy with overall analytical performance depending on genomic regions

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02315-0

关键词

Oncopanel sequencing; Target enrichment; Molecular diagnostics; Reproducibility; Analytical performance; Precision medicine

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  3. National Library of Medicine
  4. National Key R&D Project of China [2018YFE0201600]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31720103909]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2017SHZDZX01]
  7. FDA BAA grant [HHSF223201510172C]
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [APP1108254, APP1114016, APP1173594]
  9. Cancer Institute NSW Early Career Fellowship [2018/ECF013]
  10. MEYS of the CR under the project CEITEC 2020 [LQ1601]
  11. MH CR [NV19-03-00091]
  12. research infrastructure EATRIS-CZ - MEYS CR [LM2018133]
  13. MEYS CR project CEITEC 2020 [LQ1601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All panels exhibit high sensitivity for variants within the 5-20% VAF range in high-confidence coding regions, but sensitivity decreases when using VAF thresholds due to variability in VAF measurements. Enforcing a VAF threshold for reporting reduces false positive calls, and false positive rate is higher outside high-confidence coding regions, leading to lower reproducibility. Region restriction and VAF thresholds result in low technical variability in estimating promising biomarkers and tumor mutational burden.
BackgroundTargeted sequencing using oncopanels requires comprehensive assessments of accuracy and detection sensitivity to ensure analytical validity. By employing reference materials characterized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-led SEquence Quality Control project phase2 (SEQC2) effort, we perform a cross-platform multi-lab evaluation of eight Pan-Cancer panels to assess best practices for oncopanel sequencing.ResultsAll panels demonstrate high sensitivity across targeted high-confidence coding regions and variant types for the variants previously verified to have variant allele frequency (VAF) in the 5-20% range. Sensitivity is reduced by utilizing VAF thresholds due to inherent variability in VAF measurements. Enforcing a VAF threshold for reporting has a positive impact on reducing false positive calls. Importantly, the false positive rate is found to be significantly higher outside the high-confidence coding regions, resulting in lower reproducibility. Thus, region restriction and VAF thresholds lead to low relative technical variability in estimating promising biomarkers and tumor mutational burden.ConclusionThis comprehensive study provides actionable guidelines for oncopanel sequencing and clear evidence that supports a simplified approach to assess the analytical performance of oncopanels. It will facilitate the rapid implementation, validation, and quality control of oncopanels in clinical use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据