4.1 Review

Definitions and Concepts for Quantitative Rockfall Hazard and Risk Analysis

期刊

GEOSCIENCES
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences11040158

关键词

rockfall; failure; propagation; hazard; risk; probability; frequency

资金

  1. French research project C2ROP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the need for quantitative rockfall hazard and risk assessment, emphasizing the importance of precise definition of terms and concepts. It suggests methods for deriving main hazard and risk descriptors for localized and diffuse hazards. By assessing failure probabilities, reach probabilities, and exposure levels, the paper provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating rockfall risks.
There is an increasing need for quantitative rockfall hazard and risk assessment that requires a precise definition of the terms and concepts used for this particular type of landslide. This paper suggests using terms that appear to be the most logic and explicit as possible and describes methods to derive some of the main hazards and risk descriptors. The terms and concepts presented concern the rockfall process (failure, propagation, fragmentation, modelling) and the hazard and risk descriptors, distinguishing the cases of localized and diffuse hazards. For a localized hazard, the failure probability of the considered rock compartment in a given period of time has to be assessed, and the probability for a given element at risk to be impacted with a given energy must be derived combining the failure probability, the reach probability, and the exposure of the element. For a diffuse hazard that is characterized by a failure frequency, the number of rockfalls reaching the element at risk per unit of time and with a given energy (passage frequency) can be derived. This frequency is relevant for risk assessment when the element at risk can be damaged several times. If it is not replaced, the probability that it is impacted by at least one rockfall is more relevant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据