期刊
JOURNAL OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 28-50出版社
BRILL
DOI: 10.1163/18722636-12341419
关键词
meliorism; progress; eschatology; pessimism; optimism; secularism; Enlightenment; American Pragmatism
The paper describes meliorism as a middle path between optimism and pessimism, characterized by pragmatism, humanism, secularism, and historical grounding. Epistemic modesty is a key feature of meliorism, stemming from a deep understanding of the long history of debates about progress and enlightenment.
There is no grand narrative or master plan for historical progress. Contemporary discussions of progress and enlightenment reflect an improved version of an old debate, which has progressed beyond older debates about metaphysical optimism and pessimism. Responding to recent work by John Gray, Steven Pinker, and others, this paper describes meliorism as a middle path between optimism and pessimism. Meliorism is pragmatic, humanistic, secular, and historically grounded. The epistemic modesty of meliorism develops out of understanding the long history of debates about progress and enlightenment, including the history of meliorism itself. The paper provides a historical account of the development of meliorism, while arguing that understanding this history helps us make progress in thinking about progress.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据