4.3 Article

The dynamics of gender earnings differentials: Evidence from establishment data

期刊

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103713

关键词

Gender earnings gap; Establishment; Wage age-profiles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite significant workforce gains by women in recent decades, a gender earnings gap still exists and widens over the course of men's and women's careers. Research shows that for college-educated workers, the increasing gap is mainly due to differential earnings growth within the same establishment, while for workers without a college degree, it is mainly driven by differences in earnings across establishments. Marriage also plays a crucial role in the widening of the gender earnings gap through establishment components for both education groups.
Despite dramatic workforce gains by women in recent decades, a substantial gender earnings gap persists and widens over the course of men's and women's careers. Since there are earnings differences across establishments, a key question is whether the widening of the gender pay gap arises from differences in career advances within the same establishment or from differential gains from job-to-job moves across establishments. Using a unique match between the 200 0 Decennial Census of the United States and the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data, we find that both channels are important and affect workers differently by education. For the college educated, the increasing gap is for the most part due to differential earnings growth within establishment. The establishment component explains only 27% of the widening of the total gender pay gap for this group. For workers without college degree, the establishment component is the main driver of the, relatively small, widening of the gender earnings gap. For both education groups, marriage plays a crucial role in the establishment component of the increasing earnings gap. (c) 2021ElsevierB.V. Allrightsreserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据