4.3 Article

Removal of xanthate from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto untreated and acid/base treated activated carbons

期刊

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 220-233

出版社

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.26683

关键词

Adsorption removal; Ethyl xanthate; Activated carbon; Adsorption mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xanthate removal from aqueous solutions by activated carbon adsorption was studied in this research. The results indicated that activated carbon is a high-potential adsorbent for xanthate removal, with the adsorption primarily occurring on non-polar carbon surface patches driven by hydrophobic interactions. Adsorption process was found to be spontaneous and endothermic, with pore diffusion identified as the rate-limiting step.
Xanthate is a widely common pollutant in wastewaters of mineral industries. The removal of ethyl xanthate (EX-), the most widely used xanthates in mineral industries, from aqueous solutions was studied by activated carbon adsorption as the clean and cost-effective industrial wastewater treatment technology. The characterization of activated carbon (AC) was performed by a point of zero charge determination, scanning electron microscopy, wavelength dispersive X-ray, surface area, and a pore size analyzer. The evaluation of initial solution concentration, pH, temperature, particle size, and surface chemistry of AC on the adsorption process showed that it is a high-potential adsorbent for xanthate removal. The study of EX- adsorption onto acid/base treated ACs revealed that the adsorption of EX- primarily occurs on non-polar carbon surface patches where it is driven by hydrophobic interactions. The equilibrium and kinetic data were best modeled by the Koble-Corrigan isotherm and fractional power kinetic model, respectively. The rate-limiting step during the EX- adsorption onto AC was determined to be pore diffusion. The thermodynamic studies revealed that the adsorption process is spontaneous and endothermic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据