4.3 Article

Relationship between the addition of carbon nanotubes and cut-off of ultrafiltration membranes and their effect on retention of microcontaminants

期刊

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 263-272

出版社

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.26698

关键词

Micropollutants; Carbon nanotubes; Ultrafiltration; Fouling; Cut-off

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2016/21/B/ST8/03128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of nanotubes to the membrane changes surface properties, affecting its ability to retain contaminants in water. Different modifications of nanotubes are used based on the purpose of the membrane and compounds to be retained. Functionalization of nanotubes has been shown to improve adsorption and alter membrane properties such as hydrophilicity and porosity.
The addition of nanotubes changes the surface properties of the membrane - it affects the charge on the membrane surface, the contact angle, the porosity of the membrane, and thus its effectiveness on the retention of contaminants in water. Depending on the purpose for which the membrane is to be used, as well as the compounds to be retained, various modifications of nanotubes are used - their functionalization with strong acids cause functional groups such as carboxyls, hydroxyls, amines, or amides to appear on the surface of the membrane. In this paper, single-walled carbon nanotubes with carboxyl groups were used with high-purity, large surface area, single-walled nanotubes to test their properties in the removal of microcontaminants. In this work, the participation of nanotubes in the membrane matrix was combined with surface properties and cut-off measurements of the membrane. However, due to the addition of carbon nanotubes, the adsorption was improved; it also resulted in changes to the hydrophilicity of the membrane, porosity, and charge on its surface. Four substances were used in the study: caffeine, bisphenol A, carbamazepine, and endosulfan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据