4.6 Article

PEDOT:PSS-glued MoO3 nanowire network for all-solid-state flexible transparent supercapacitors

期刊

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 12, 页码 3502-3512

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1na00121c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61874166, U1832149]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Qinghai Province [2020-HZ-809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study achieved significant performance enhancement in FTSCs using a novel electrode material AMP, with high transmittance and large areal capacitance. The design also demonstrated excellent cycle life and mechanical robustness, showcasing great potential in high-performance FTSCs.
Flexible transparent supercapacitors (FTSCs) are essential for the development of next-generation transparent electronics, however, a significant challenge is to achieve high-areal-capacitance FTSCs without sacrificing optical transparency. Herein, poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)-glued MoO3 nanowires anchored on the Ag nanofiber (AgNF) network are employed as FTSC film electrodes, in which the AgNF network provides primary conducting pathways and guarantees rapid electron transport, while wide-bandgap semiconductor MoO3 nanowires glued by the ultrathin PEDOT:PSS layer provide abundant redox-active sites to store energy. Benefiting from the PEDOT:PSS as the conducting glue to promote the connection at the junctions between AgNFs and MoO3 nanowires, the as-prepared AgNFs/MoO3/PEDOT:PSS (AMP) film electrode demonstrates a high transmittance (82.8%) and large areal capacitance (15.7 mF cm(-2)), and has outperformed all the transparent conductive films known to date. Even after 11 000 charge/discharge cycles, the capacitance still remains at 92.4% of the initial value. The assembled all-solid-state FTSC device delivers an energy density of 0.623 mu W h cm(-2), a power density of 40 mu W cm(-2), and excellent mechanical robustness, implying a great potential in high performance FTSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据