4.6 Article

Inherited weak topological insulator signatures in the topological hourglass semimetal Nb3XTe6 (X = Si, Ge)

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.165107

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFA0307000]
  2. Chinese National Key Research and Development Program [2018FYA0305800, 2017YFA0302901, 2016YFA0300604]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2032128, U2032204, 11874047, 92065201, 11790313]
  4. Singapore Ministry of Education AcRF Tier 2 [MOE2019-T2-1-001]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB33000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using spin-resolved and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, as well as first-principles calculations, the study identified bulk band inversion and a spin-polarized surface state evolved from a weak topological insulator phase in van der Waals materials Nb3XTe6 (X = Si, Ge). The unique topological state with nonsymmorphic symmetry protection consists of a pair of valence and conduction bands encoding weak TI and hourglass semimetal nature, differing from previously studied TIs based on band inversions without symmetry protections.
Using spin-resolved and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and first-principles calculations, we have identified bulk band inversion and the spin-polarized surface state evolved from a weak topological insulator (TI) phase in van der Waals materials Nb3XTe6 (X = Si, Ge). The fingerprints of weak TIs homologically emerge with hourglass fermions as multinodal chains composed by the same pair of valence and conduction bands gapped by spin-orbit coupling. The unique topological state, with a pair of valence and conduction bands encoding both weak TI and hourglass semimetal nature, is essential and guaranteed by nonsymmorphic symmetry. It is distinct from TIs studied previously based on band inversions without symmetry protections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据