4.6 Article

Skin effect and winding number in disordered non-Hermitian systems

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L140201

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Office of Naval Research (ONR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) [N00014-20-1-2325]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) [EFMA-1627184]
  3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the non-Hermitian skin effect, extends the definition of the winding number to disordered NH systems, and verifies that the real-space formula can still predict the NH skin effect.
Unlike their Hermitian counterparts, non-Hermitian (NH) systems may display an exponential sensitivity to boundary conditions and an extensive number of edge-localized states in systems with open boundaries, a phenomena dubbed the non-Hermitian skin effect. The NH skin effect is one of the primary challenges to defining a topological theory of NH Hamiltonians, as the sensitivity to boundary conditions invalidates the traditional bulk-boundary correspondence. The NH skin effect has recently been connected to the winding number, a topological invariant unique to NH systems. In this paper we extend the definition of the winding number to disordered NH systems by generalizing established results on disordered Hermitian topological insulators. Our real-space winding number is self-averaging, continuous as a function of the parameters in the problem, and remains quantized even in the presence of strong disorder. We verify that our real-space formula still predicts the NH skin effect, allowing for the possibility of predicting and observing the NH skin effect in strongly disordered NH systems. We use our theory to demonstrate the NH Anderson skin effect, in which a skin effect is developed as disorder is added to a clean system, as well as explain recent results in optical funnels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据