4.6 Article

Hierarchy of higher-order Floquet topological phases in three dimensions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.115308

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [VR 2019-04735]
  2. Lehigh University
  3. Vinnova [2019-04735] Funding Source: Vinnova
  4. Swedish Research Council [2019-04735] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a hierarchy of higher-order Floquet topological phases in three dimensions is constructed by periodically driving static first-order topological phases with suitable discrete symmetry breaking Wilson-Dirac masses. Realizations of second-order and third-order Floquet topological states, supporting dynamic hinge and corner modes, respectively, are demonstrated by introducing one and two discrete symmetry breaking Wilson-Dirac mass(es). The resulting dynamic hinge and corner modes, protected by antiunitary spectral or particle-hole symmetries, live on boundaries with different codimensions.
Following a general protocol of periodically driving static first-order topological phases (supporting surface states) with suitable discrete symmetry breaking Wilson-Dirac masses, here we construct a hierarchy of higher-order Floquet topological phases in three dimensions. In particular, we demonstrate realizations of both second-order and third-order Floquet topological states, respectively supporting dynamic hinge and corner modes at zero quasienergy, by periodically driving their static first-order parent states with one and two discrete symmetry breaking Wilson-Dirac mass(es). While the static surface states are characterized by codimension d(c) = 1, the resulting dynamic hinge (corner) modes, protected by antiunitary spectral or particle-hole symmetries, live on the boundaries with d(c) = 2 (3). We exemplify these outcomes for three-dimensional topological insulators and Dirac semimetals, with the latter ones following an arbitrary spin-j representation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据