相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals
Alfred C. Kuo et al.
JAMA SURGERY (2020)
Determination of normal KOOS and WOMAC values in a healthy population
Vincent Marot et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2019)
Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review
Derya Celik et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Ahmad R. Sedaghat
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY (2019)
Normative Values for the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for the US General Population
Johannes M. Giesinger et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2019)
Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Revision Hip Arthroscopy
Benedict U. Nwachukwu et al.
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY (2018)
How Much Pain Is Significant? Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Visual Analog Scale for Pain After Total Joint Arthroplasty
Jonathan R. Danoff et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2018)
Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the French version of the Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty
Shahnaz Klouche et al.
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH (2018)
What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
Stephen Lyman et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2018)
MINIMUM CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE: CURRENT TRENDS IN THE ORTHOPAEDIC LITERATURE, PART II: LOWER EXTREMITY A Systematic Review
Anne G. Copay et al.
JBJS REVIEWS (2018)
Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics
Man Hung et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS (2018)
The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis
Wu Chean Lee et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2017)
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis
Jesus Martin-Fernandez et al.
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2017)
Patient-reported health outcomes after total hip and knee surgery in a Dutch University Hospital Setting: results of twenty years clinical registry
Philip J. van der Wees et al.
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2017)
Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris Hip Score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty
Jasvinder A. Singh et al.
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2016)
Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery
David J. Beard et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively
Aksel Paulsen et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2014)
The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: success depends on how you measure it
F. M. Impellizzeri et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2012)
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2012)
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients
P. Ornetti et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2010)
Perception of Improvement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Varies With Disease Activity Levels at Baseline
D. Aletaha et al.
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2009)
Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population
C. Delaunay et al.
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH (2009)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods
Anne G. Copay et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2007)
The inconsistency of optimal cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve
NJ Perkins et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) -: validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement -: art. no. 10
AK Nilsdotter et al.
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2003)
分享论文
