4.7 Article

Contrasted release of insoluble elements (Fe, Al, rare earth elements, Th, Pa) after dust deposition in seawater: a tank experiment approach

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 2663-2678

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-2663-2021

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Program [PIOF-GA-2012-626734]
  2. CNRS-INSU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments conducted under controlled conditions show that lithogenic elements have low dissolution rates in Mediterranean seawater, and changes in temperature and pH can influence the release of these elements in seawater.
Lithogenic elements such as aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), rare earth elements (REEs), thorium (Th-232 and Th-230, given as Th) and protactinium (Pa) are often assumed to be insoluble. In this study, their dissolution from Saharan dust reaching Mediterranean seawater was studied through tank experiments over 3 to 4 d under controlled conditions including controls without dust addition as well as dust seeding under present and future climate conditions (+3 degrees C and -0.3 pH). Unfiltered surface seawater from three oligotrophic regions (Tyrrhenian Sea, Ionian Sea and Algerian Basin) were used. The maximum dissolution was low for all seeding experiments: less than 0.3 % for Fe, 1 % for Th-232 and Al, about 2 %-5 % for REEs and less than 6 % for Pa. Different behaviors were observed: dissolved Al increased until the end of the experiments, Fe did not dissolve significantly, and Th and light REEs were scavenged back on particles after a fast initial release. The constant Th-230/Th-232 ratio during the scavenging phase suggests that there is little or no further dissolution after the initial Th release. Quite unexpectedly, comparison of present and future conditions indicates that changes in temperature and/or pH influence the release of Th and REEs in seawater, leading to lower Th release and a higher light REE release under increased greenhouse conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据