4.8 Article

Design of a self-sufficient hydride-shuttling cascade for concurrent bioproduction of 7,12-dioxolithocholate and l-tert-leucine

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 4125-4133

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc01120k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1706200, 2019YFA09005000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971381, 21871085, 21536004]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [22221818014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a highly atom-economic, self-sufficient hydride-shuttling cascade that concurrently obtains two pharmaceutically important building blocks, demonstrating the potential of cofactors in bio-oxidation.
Oxidoreductase-mediated biotransformation often requires consumption of a secondary sacrificial co-substrate and an additional auxiliary enzyme to drive the cofactor regeneration, which results in generation of unwanted by-product. Herein, we report a highly atom-economic self-sufficient hydride-shuttling cascade to concurrently obtain two pharmaceutically important building blocks (7,12-dioxo-lithocholic acid and l-tert-leucine) in which oxidation of cholic acid (CA) and reductive amination of trimethylpyruvic acid were integrated for redox self-recycling. In this cascade, the cofactor acts as a hydride shuttle that interconnects the two synthetically relevant reactions at the cost of only inorganic ammonium as the sacrificial agent and generates water as the greenest by-product. The preparative biotransformation using a whole-cell biocatalyst in the absence of any exogenous cofactor displayed a space-time yield of 768 g L-1 d(-1) and a total turnover number (TTN) of 20 363 for NAD(+) recycling. This represents the highest cofactor TTN reported to date for the bio-oxidation of CA, indicating the great potential of this cofactor and redox self-sufficient bioprocess for cost-effective and sustainable biomanufacturing of high-value-added products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据