4.6 Article

Sustainable synthesis of AFe2O4 (A = Mg, Zn, Mn) catalysts: comparing the photooxidative and electrochemical properties towards organic dyes detection and degradation

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 22, 页码 10049-10056

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj01367j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stella Maris College, Chennai [MOST-108-2221-E-027-063]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST-108-2221-E-027-063]
  3. National Taipei University of Technology (NTUT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green solvents, as alternatives to toxic solvents, reduce energy requirements and the rate of chemical waste production. The sustainable synthesis of AFe(2)O(4) catalyst using deep eutectic solvent mixture shows the importance of next-generation solvents in the fabrication of functional materials.
By serving as alternatives to toxic and hazardous solvents, green solvents assist in implementing the idea of sustainability. The use of these neoteric reaction media dramatically reduces energy requirements and moderates the rate at which chemical waste is produced. In this work, we propose the sustainable synthesis of AFe(2)O(4) catalyst (A = Mg, Zn, Mn) using a deep eutectic solvent (DES) mixture. The choline chloride-malonic acid based DES system shows heterogeneities at the nanoscopic stage, allowing for a more holistic production of spinels via a modified solid-state route with less environmental effect. Structural and morphological analyses of the synthesized ferrites clearly demonstrate the importance of next-generation solvents in the fabrication of functional materials. The ability of these synthesized samples to act as magnetically separable catalysts for the effective degradation and electrochemical detection of hazardous dye contaminants in water bodies using visible light has also been investigated. This approach quantifies green chemistry metrics and proves that functional materials can be effectively modified and improved at the nanoscale for a variety of applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据