4.2 Article

The issue is not 'compliance': exploring exposure to malaria vector bites through social dynamics in Burkina Faso

期刊

ANTHROPOLOGY & MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 508-525

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2021.1884185

关键词

Bednets; compliance; lifeways; exposure; ethnography; assemblage

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust through the 'Improving the efficacy of malaria prevention in an insecticide-resistant Africa (MIRA)' project [200222/Z/15/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the concept of compliance with bednet use in an area of high malaria transmission in south-west Burkina Faso through ethnographic fieldwork. It critically examines the micro-environments that influence bednet use and assesses the effectiveness of bednets in the community. The study emphasizes that compliance with bednet use is a complex process influenced by various social and individual factors.
Credited with averting almost 68% of new cases between 2000 and 2015, insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) are one of the most efficacious malaria-prevention tools. Their effectiveness, however, depends on if and how they are used, making 'compliance' (and the social factors affecting it) a key area of interest for research on malaria transmission. This article situates the notion of compliance with 'bednet use' within everyday practices in an area of south-west Burkina Faso with high malaria transmission. By drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2017 and 2018, it critically describes the precarious micro-environments that foreground bednet use-from gender and age to the means of (re)production of social and labour conditions-and assesses the bednets' effectiveness and community uptake. Bednet use stems from concrete, ordinary dynamics that interweave only apparently at the margins of the time individuals most need to be protected by a net. This work conceptualises 'compliance' beyond binary indicators of intervention uptake and locates 'use' as the result of contingent assemblages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据