4.3 Article

Expeditious and enhanced sequestration of heavy metal ions from aqueous environment by papaya peel carbon: a green and low-cost adsorbent

期刊

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 365-376

出版社

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.26562

关键词

PPC; Adsorbent; Isotherm; Kinetics; Thermodynamics

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India [SPARC/2018-2019/P307/SL]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that papaya peel carbon (PPC) can effectively remove heavy metal ions Pb(II), Cu(II), and Ni(II) from aqueous phases, making it a potential low-cost alternative adsorbent. The research also explored optimal adsorption conditions and kinetic parameters, providing insights into the adsorption process mechanisms.
In this study, papaya peel carbon (PPC) has been explored as a potential adsorbent for the removal of Pb(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) from their aqueous phases. Optimum adsorption conditions such as contact time, pH, initial metal ion concentrations, adsorbent dosage and temperature were determined. Optimum pH for the removal of Pb(II) and Ni(II) was found to be 6, while for Cu(II) it was 5. Maximum monolayer adsorption capacity (q(m)) was found to be 40.98, 38.02 and 32.25 mg g(-)(1) for Pb(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions, respectively. To study the kinetic parameters and mechanism of adsorption process, pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, intraparticle diffusion and Elovich kinetic models were elucidated. D-R adsorption isotherm model best described adsorption of Pb(II) and Ni(II) ions onto PPC, whereas Freundlich adsorption isotherm described adsorption of Cu(II). To further predict the nature of adsorption, thermodynamic parameters such as Delta G degrees, Delta H degrees and Delta S degrees were calculated and positive values of Delta H degrees indicated endothermic nature of the process. Thus overall results confirmed that PPC can be effectively used as an alternative and low-cost adsorbent for the removal of heavy metal ions Pb(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据