4.2 Article

Generalization of group-theoretic coherent states for variational calculations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023090

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC-2111-39081486]
  2. VILLUM FONDEN via the QMATH center of excellence [10059]
  3. Harvard-MIT CUA
  4. ARO [W911NF-20-1-0163]
  5. National Science Foundation [OAC-1934714]
  6. NSF EAGERQAC-QSA: Quantum Algorithms for Correlated ElectronPhonon System [2222-206-2014111]
  7. ERC Grant QUENOCOBA, ERC-2016-AD [742102]
  8. NSFC [11974363]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces families of pure quantum states by constructing operators and applying them to regular coherent states, generating entanglement not found in the coherent states themselves while preserving their desirable properties. It also explains how to efficiently evaluate the expectation values of physical observables and discusses the applicability of these states in condensed matter physics and quantum information as variational families.
We introduce families of pure quantum states that are constructed on top of the well-known Gilmore-Perelomov group-theoretic coherent states. We do this by constructing unitaries as the exponential of operators quadratic in Cartan subalgebra elements and by applying these unitaries to regular group-theoretic coherent states. This enables us to generate entanglement not found in the coherent states themselves, while retaining many of their desirable properties. Most importantly, we explain how the expectation values of physical observables can be evaluated efficiently. Examples include generalized spin-coherent states and generalized Gaussian states, but our construction can be applied to any Lie group represented on the Hilbert space of a quantum system. We comment on their applicability as variational families in condensed matter physics and quantum information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据