4.6 Article

High magnetic field ultrasound study of spin freezing in La1.88Sr0.12CuO4

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.115133

关键词

-

资金

  1. Laboratoire d'Excellence LANEF [ANR-10-LABX-51-01]
  2. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-19-CE30-0019-01]
  3. EUR Grant NanoX [ANR-17-EURE-0009]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals a coupling between the lattice and spin glass in lanthanum-based cuprates at specific doping levels, leading to anomalies in sound velocity and attenuation. This suggests a strong competition between superconductivity and spin freezing, which can be tuned by the magnetic field.
High-T-c cuprate superconductors host spin, charge, and lattice instabilities. In particular, in the antiferromagnetic glass phase, over a large doping range, lanthanum-based cuprates display a glass-like spin freezing with antiferromagnetic correlations. Previously, sound velocity anomalies in La1.88Sr0.12CuO4 (LSCO) for hole doping p = x >= 0.145 were reported and interpreted as arising from a coupling of the lattice to the magnetic glass [M. Frachet, I. Vinograd et al., Nat. Phys. 16, 1064 (2020)]. Here we report both sound velocity and attenuation in LSCO p = 0.12, i.e., at a doping level for which the spin freezing temperature is the highest. Using high magnetic fields and comparing with nuclear magnetic resonance measurements, we confirm that the anomalies in the low temperature ultrasound properties of LSCO are produced by a coupling between the lattice and the spin glass. Moreover, we show that both sound velocity and attenuation can be simultaneously accounted for by a simple phenomenological model originally developed for canonical spin glasses. Our results point towards a strong competition between superconductivity and spin freezing, tuned by the magnetic field. A comparison of different acoustic modes suggests that the slow spin fluctuations have a nematic character.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据