4.2 Article

Dose related acute behavioral and neurochemical profile of pioglitazone

期刊

PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 615-620

出版社

UNIV KARACHI
DOI: 10.36721/PJPS.2021.34.2.REG.615-620.1

关键词

Pioglitazone; depression; anxiety; serotonin; dopamine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetic patients have a higher risk of depression, and pioglitazone, a drug commonly used to treat diabetes, may have antidepressant effects but also exhibit anxiogenic and sedative effects in animal studies. Furthermore, pioglitazone may alter neurotransmitter metabolism, potentially leading to increased sensitivity to CNS depressants in diabetic patients.
Diabetics are twice as likely to have depression. It's normal to have long periods of sadness and anxiety. Pioglitazone has important role in the inflammatory response, which suggests that it might have the associated antidepressant effects being manifested by its anti-depressant profile which needs further exploration. Monitoring changes in behavioral and neurochemical profile of pioglitazone in a dose-dependent manner was the purpose of this study. Pioglitazone was injected to rats at the doses of 0mg/kg, 2.5mg/kg, 5mg/kg and 10mg/kg. Behavioral activities in open field, Skinner's box and elevated plus maze were monitored 20, 35 and 45 minutes respectively after pioglitazone injection. whole brain samples were collected following decapitation of rats one-hour after injection. Samples were kept at -70 degrees C till HPLC-EC analysis for neurochemical profile. Results show anxiogenic and sedative effects of pioglitazone at all three doses as indicated by Skinner's box, elevated plus maze activity and open field. Also there was an overall decreased dopamine metabolism and increased serotonin turnover. This suggests that diabetic patients using pioglitazone as a therapeutic option, may experience more potent effects of CNS depressants. Findings may help in extending therapeutics in diabetic patients suffering from anxiety and/or depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据