4.7 Article

Financial development, openness, innovation, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105194

关键词

Economic growth; Carbon emissions; Financial development; Innovation; PSTR model

资金

  1. Major Project Post - Ministry of Education of China [19JHQ008]
  2. Major Project of Beijing Municipal Philosophy and Social Sciences Fund [18ZDA04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study, based on balanced panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 1987 to 2017, explores the impact of carbon emissions on economic growth through a panel smooth transition regression model. The empirical results reveal significant non-linear relationships between carbon emissions, financial development, openness, innovation, and economic growth. It also shows that carbon emissions attenuate the promoting effects of financial development and innovation on economic growth, with differences in impact between the northern and southern regions.
Drawing on balanced panel data of 30 Chinese provinces in 1987-2017, this paper examines the impact of carbon emissions on economic growth through the panel smooth transition regression model. Estimation is conducted based on the whole sample as well as the northern region and southern region subsamples. Empirical results reveal that: i) noticeable non-linear relationships do exist among carbon emissions, financial development, openness, innovation, and economic growth; and ii) carbon emissions attenuate the promoting effects of financial development and innovation on economic growth, which is also confirmed by using energy consumption as the transition variable; and iii) subsample estimations further discover that the impact of carbon emissions on economic growth is significantly different between the two regions, with the northern region having a lower carbon emissions threshold but quicker transition speed. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据