4.6 Review

In Situ Synchrotron X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of Anode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries

期刊

BATTERIES & SUPERCAPS
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 1547-1566

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/batt.202100006

关键词

in situ; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; batteries; mechanism; anode materials

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [LP160101629, DP210101486, LE180100141, DP200101862]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1904216]
  3. AINSE Limited
  4. Australian Research Council [LE180100141] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) can accurately elucidate the electrochemical reaction mechanisms of batteries by probing dynamic electronic and local atomic structure information. This review introduces the basic principles and design strategies for in situ XAS experiments, summarizes significant studies of battery anodes, and outlines current challenges and future opportunities based on XAS measurements.
Taking advantage of a high-flux light source, synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) beamline is able to perform in situ/ex situ, element-selective, and qualitative/quantitative experiments to elucidate electrochemical reaction mechanisms of batteries accurately and efficiently. In situ synchrotron XAS probes dynamic electronic and local atomic structure information, including valence state, charge transfer, local geometry and symmetry, bond number/length/type and disorder degree, of target elements of significance during battery operation, which facilitates to promote the development of rechargeable batteries by building accurate structure-performance relationships fundamentally. In this review, the basic principles for XAS are briefly introduced, design strategies for in situ XAS experiments are proposed, salient in situ XAS studies of battery anodes are summarized, and current challenges and future opportunities based on XAS measurements are also outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据