4.7 Article

Interacting jammed granular systems

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.042901

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG [STA 425/38-1, STA 425/46-1]
  2. Hungarian National Research, Development, and Innovation Office (NKFIH) [OTKA K 116036]
  3. BME IE-VIZ TKP2020 program
  4. DAAD
  5. TEMPUS within the researcher exchange program [274464]
  6. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology of Hungary [UNKP-19-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduced a simple system to analyze the statistical properties of jammed granular ensembles and test Edwards' theory. Results showed that in a coupled system of two subsystems with different properties, the system must be considered as a single entity to be described by Edwards' theory, as constraints in stresses lead to counterintuitive effects.
More than 30 years ago Edwards and co-authors proposed a model to describe the statistics of granular packings by an ensemble of equiprobable jammed states. Experimental tests of this model remained scarce so far. We introduce a simple system to analyze statistical properties of jammed granular ensembles to test Edwards theory. Identical spheres packed in a nearly two-dimensional geometrical confinement were studied in experiments and numerical simulations. When tapped, the system evolves toward a ground state, but due to incompatible domain structures it gets trapped. Analytical calculations reproduce relatively well our simulation results, which allows us to test Edwards theory on a coupled system of two subsystems with different properties. We find that the joint system can only be described by the Edwards theory if considered as a single system due to the constraints in the stresses. The results show counterintuitive effects as in the coupled system the change in the order parameter is opposite to what is expected from the change in the compactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据