4.8 Review

Material design and structure optimization for rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

MATTER
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 1142-1188

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.01.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [52025133]
  2. Tencent Foundation
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [JQ18005]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0206701]
  5. BIC-ESAT funding
  6. Initiative Postdocs Supporting Program
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M640024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review covers the development process, working principle, scientific problems, and corresponding solutions of Li-S batteries, as well as the main research advancements and commercialization concerns. The perspective on the development of high-performance Li-S batteries is also discussed, aiming to provide guidance for future research direction and material design optimization.
With the merits of low cost, abundant resources, environment friendliness, and high energy density, the Li-S battery is recognized as a promising alternative to the Li ion battery and is anticipated to play an important role in high-energy-density electrochemical storage systems. In this review, we first review the development process of Li-S batteries and briefly introduce the working principle of Li-S batteries. The scientific problems existing in the Li-S batteries, such as sulfur cathode, separator, electrolyte, and Li anode, and the corresponding countermeasures, are then summarized. Subsequently, main research advancements of Li-S batteries are comprehensively reviewed, and the critical concerns about commercialization of Li-S batteries are discussed. Finally, we give our perspectives on the development of high-performance Li-S batteries. We hope this review can provide the timely and comprehensive information on the future research direction of Li-S batteries and offer the guidance for material design and structure optimization of Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据