4.2 Article

Sorafenib and Lenvatinib Treatment for Metastasis/Recurrence of Radioactive Iodine-refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

期刊

IN VIVO
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 1057-1064

出版社

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12350

关键词

Differentiated thyroid carcinoma; sorafenib; lenvatinib; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that lenvatinib (LEN) may be more effective than sorafenib (SOR) in patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RR-DTC), with a higher partial response rate. After LEN treatment, the levels of serum thyroglobulin significantly decreased in patients, but the choice of first-line drug should be based on individual patient characteristics and adverse events.
Background/Aim: Radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RR-DTC) has been treated with multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs), e.g., sorafenib (SOR) and lenvatinib (LEN). We analyzed the outcomes of RR-DTC patients who underwent SOR or LEN treatment at Kuma Hospital. Patients and Methods: We enrolled 21 and 18 patients treated with SOR and LEN, respectively. Results: The incidence of partial response in the LEN group was significantly higher than that in the SOR group. Serum thyroglobulin significantly decreased from the beginning of treatment to 1 month later in the LEN group (not in the SOR group). The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly decreased at 1 month later in both groups. An NLR >= 3 at the start of MKI treatment had a prognostic impact. Conclusion: For RR-DTC, LEN could be more effective than SOR, at least in the short term. The first-line drug should be selected based on other factors (e.g., adverse events, patient background).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据