4.5 Review

The impact of moving more, physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness: Why we should strive to measure and improve fitness?

期刊

PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 77-82

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.11.003

关键词

Chronic disease; Prevention; Physical inactivity; Sedentary time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regular physical activity is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Despite the well-established benefits, most adults and children do not engage in adequate levels of physical activity. Any increase in physical movement, whether from work, leisure, or household tasks, can have significant health benefits.
A large and growing body of epidemiologic research spanning roughly 7 decades has demonstrated that individuals who are more physically active have a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality compared to those who are comparatively sedentary. Despite these well-established benefits of physical activity (PA), most adults and children do not get an adequate amount of PA. This is true not just in the United States but has been increasingly recognized throughout advanced countries. The theme of this Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases Symposium is moving more, recognizing that any amount of increased physical movement, including occupational, recreational, household tasks, etc., has significant health benefits. Being physically active is associated with better health outcomes independent of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), a concept that would have been considered heretical a few decades ago. We now recognize that simply moving from a sedentary to a moderately active group or modest increases in CRF (e.g. moving from the least fit quintile of CRF to the next least fit quintile) has the most noticeable health benefits. In this review, the concept of moving more and its implications for CRF are discussed as they relate to the prevention and treatment of CVD. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据