4.7 Article

Stabilizing supported gold catalysts in acetylene hydrochlorination by constructing an acetylene-deficient reaction phase

期刊

GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 9-14

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gee.2020.06.012

关键词

Supported Au catalysts; Acetylene-deficient; Reaction phase; Acetylene hydrochlorination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21606199, 21476207]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [LGG20B060004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces an innovative strategy of coating an ionic liquid film on the surface of gold (Au) catalysts to construct an acetylene-deficient reaction phase, which enhances catalytic stability. Furthermore, kinetic and theoretical analysis demonstrate that this constructed reaction phase can inhibit the reduction of gold and generation of carbon deposition.
In the process of acetylene hydrochlorination, the rapid deactivation of supported gold (Au) catalysts by acetylene is still a huge challenge. Here, we provide an innovative strategy for constructing an acetylene-deficient reaction phase on the active site by coating an ionic liquid film on the Au(H2O)/C surface. The reactant ratio of C2H2 to HCl in this acetylene-deficient reaction phase is 1:132, in contrast to the 1:1 M ratio in the gas phase, thus boosting the catalytic stability of Au(H2O)/C catalysts. The kinetic and theoretical analysis showed that the reduction of cationic gold by C2H2 and the generation of carbon deposition can be inhibited in this constructed reaction phase during reaction. The current work not only broadens the scope of supported Au catalysts in acetylene hydrochlorination, but also verifies the perspective of the tunability of stoichiometric balance, which can be used in other catalytic applications. (C) 2021, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据