4.7 Article

Time-lapse imaging reveals differences in growth dynamics of embryos after in vitro maturation compared with conventional stimulation

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 606-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.026

关键词

Time-lapse imaging; in vitro maturation; morphokinetic parameters; clinical pregnancy rate

资金

  1. Origio, Berlin, Germany
  2. Merck Serono
  3. MSD
  4. Teva
  5. Ferring
  6. Bayer Health Care
  7. Medesso/Qonsilus
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [STR 387/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the impact of in vitro maturation (IVM) on embryonal development with the use of time-lapse imaging. Design: Retrospective case-control study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): In total, 294 embryos were cultured after intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment of three groups: patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and IVM (n = 105; group 1 [G1]), patients after conventional stimulation without PCOS (n = 115; G2) and with PCOS (n = 74; G3). In total, 171 embryos were finally analyzed (57 G1, 65 G2, and 49 G3). Intervention(s): Data of 23 PCOS patients (30 IVM cycles) from January 2012 to July 2015 were matched according to age and number of oocytes to patients after conventional stimulation without PCOS (n = 30; 30 cycles) and with PCOS (n = 16; 19 cycles). Markers of embryo development were analyzed at different time points. Pregnancy rates (PRs) and live birth rates (LBRs) were recorded. Main Outcome Measure(s): Morphokinetic differences in embryo development after IVM compared with conventional stimulation with or without PCOS. Result(s): The rate of good-quality embryos was significantly lower in G1. Embryo development in G1 was significantly accelerated to the time of appearance of two pronuclei but slowed down by the time of reaching 6-cell stage and remained slower compared with embryos of G2 and G3. PRs as well as LBRs did not differ significantly among the study groups. Conclusion(s): Although growth dynamics of embryos from G1 differ from G2 and G3 and the rate of good-quality embryos was lower in IVM embryos, PRs and LBRs did not differ significantly. (C)2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据