3.8 Proceedings Paper

Experimental and numerical investigation on erosive wear performance of hybrid polymer composites

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 4775-4783

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.973

关键词

Granite powder; Slurry jet erosion; Finite element method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article explores the fabrication and slurry erosion behavior of hybrid composites reinforced with epoxy resin and filled with granite powder. It demonstrates that addition of granite powder improves the slurry erosion resistance of the composites, especially at lower impingement angles.
This article revealed the fabrication of hybrid composites containing epoxy resin reinforced with corbon fiber and filled with granite powder. Filled composites are fabricated with incorporation of 0, 8, 16 and 24 wt% granite powder by keeping 40 wt% glass fiber loading constant. It further investigated slurry erosion wear behavior using Slurry Jet Erosion Tribometer (DUCOM TR-411) of these composites and presents a comparative study. The steady state analysis according to ASTM G-73 for erosion revealed positive effect of both the reinforcement. In case of unfilled epoxy composites, irrespective of impingement angle the slurry erosion resistance is significantly improved for reinforcement of fiber. Maximum resistance to slurry erosion wear is observed at lower impingement angle (i.e 30 and 45?) for all granite powder filled carbon epoxy composites. Reduction of slurry erosion rate observed is significant for impact velocity higher than 20 m/s. The maximum reduction in slurry erosion rate is reported for addition of granite powder from 8 to 16 wt%. The trend of slutty erosion rate predicted with finite element method is in agreement with experimental results. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Advances in Materials Processing & Manufacturing Applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据