4.0 Article

Linking DPSIR Model and Water Quality Indices to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in Groundwater Resources

期刊

HYDROLOGY
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/hydrology8020090

关键词

DPSIR; WQI; SDG; sustainability; water quality; nitrate contamination; Peloponnese; Greece

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes powerful tools to analyze the achievement of sustainable development goals related to groundwater resources in agricultural areas, revealing high concentrations of Cl-, NO3-, and electrical conductivity in groundwater samples, as well as the unsuitability for drinking at certain monitoring sites and challenges in achieving Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 6 in the study area.
The achievement of sustainable development goals in groundwater resources related to water quality issues is a critical question in many regions. This study aims to combine powerful tools for helping stakeholders and policymakers achieve sustainable development goals in groundwater resources of agricultural areas. The DPSIR (Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response) model in combination with the Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment Water Quality Index and Groundwater Directive 2006/118/European Community-Threshold Values was applied using a hydrogeochemical dataset derived from the analysis of groundwater samples collected from 31 monitoring sites in an unconfined alluvial aquifer. Elevated Cl- (up to 423.2 mg L-1), NO3- (up to 180.1 mg L-1) concentration and electrical conductivity (up to 2037 mu S cm(-1)) value are observed for groundwater samples of the study area. The outcome of the One Out-All Out procedure revealed that the groundwater in 42% of the monitored sites is unsuitable for drinking according to the health-based guideline values established by Directive 98/83/European Community. A difficulty to achieve targets under Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 6 in the study area is revealed. The proposed response actions are reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据