4.8 Article

Precise Measurement Methodology of nH-Level Gate Electrode Inductance Based on Calculation-Error-Free Algorithm for Unity-Gain Turn-Off Devices

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 68, 期 8, 页码 6818-6827

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3007089

关键词

Commutation; emitter turn-OFF thyristor (ETO); inductance measurement; integrated gate commutated thyristor (IGCT); power semiconductor devices; press pack

资金

  1. Key projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51837006]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFB0904600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a precise measurement methodology for nH-level gate electrode inductance of unity-gain turn-off devices. By utilizing a customized extraction method and gate current measurement method, the measurement achieved ultrahigh accuracy.
Gate electrode inductance is a key factor for the controllable current capacity of unity-gain turn-off devices. However, the precise and credible measurement of this nH-level inductance is very difficult due to the compact structure of housing package. In this article, a precise measurement methodology of nH-level gate electrode inductance based on calculation-error-free algorithm for unity-gain turn-off devices is proposed. First, the turn-off process was modeled and discussed. Based on the feature of different stages, a customized extraction method is proposed for nH-level inductance measurement with ultrahigh accuracy. Then, a gate current measurement method for separate cathode rings with minimum inductance introduction was invented and discussed. After careful measurement and calculation, the gate electrode inductance for each region was derived and the abrupt change in gate contact region was observed and analyzed. The inductances measured in this article can be further utilized for housing structure optimization and lateral arrangement of segments on unity-gain turn-off chips.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据