3.8 Article

Current progress and potential opportunities to infer single-cell developmental trajectory and cell fate

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coisb.2021.03.006

关键词

Cell fate; Trajectory inference; Single-cell; scRNA-seq; Pseudotime; Lineage tracing; Multiomics

资金

  1. Chan Zuckerberg Foundation [2019-202669]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) [R00HG008399, R35HG010717]
  3. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Ruth L. Kirsch-stein NRSA Individual Predoctoral Fellowship [1F31CA257625-01]
  4. European Hematology Association (EHA) Research Mobility Grant Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes recent and popular computational methods for trajectory inference and cell fate prediction, revealing previously unknown transitional cell types and differentiation processes. Future challenges and opportunities in the development of new methods for reconstructing differentiation trajectories and inferring cell fates are also described.
Rapid technological advances in transcriptomics and lineage tracing technologies provide new opportunities to understand organismal development at the single-cell level. Building on these advances, various computational methods have been proposed to infer developmental trajectories and to predict cell fate. These methods have unveiled previously uncharacterized transitional cell types and differentiation processes. Importantly, the ability to recover cell states and trajectories has been evolving hand-in-hand with new technologies and diverse experimental designs; more recent methods can capture complex trajectory topologies and infer short- and long-term cell fate dynamics. Here, we summarize and categorize the most recent and popular computational approaches for trajectory inference based on the information they leverage and describe future challenges and opportunities for the development of new methods for reconstructing differentiation trajectories and inferring cell fates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据