4.0 Article

Stability analysis of mine overburden dump stabilized with fly ash

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2018.1503780

关键词

Overburden dump; fly ash; slope stability; numerical modelling; california bearing ratio; unconfined compressive strength; factor of safety; FLAC; Slope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using fly ash to improve the stability of mine overburden dump slope is an effective method, with 10% addition of fly ash increasing the specific gravity and compressive strength values, while OB material mixed with 20% fly ash shows the maximum unconfined compressive strength.
Stability of mine overburden (OB) dump slope has been a major concern over the years and needs a proper design for safe mining operation and economy of project. Incorporation of fly ash along with the OB materials may provide an alternative mode of fly ash utilization and stability of OB dump. In the present study, fly ash was mixed at a different percentage with OB material to evaluate various geotechnical characteristics. Numerical modelling based on the finite difference method was carried out to assess the stability of fly ash mixed OB dump and to suggest the optimum dump height. The result indicates that addition of 10% fly ash by dry weight with OB material results in 21.38% and 16.31% higher California bearing ratio value than CBR value of native OB material under unsoaked and soaked conditions, respectively. The maximum unconfined compressive strength and cohesion values are observed for the OB material mixed with 20% fly ash. Based on the stability analysis, optimum dump height of 55 and 50 m is observed for 35 degrees and 37 degrees slope angle, respectively, with an addition of 10% fly ash with OB material. The decrease in shear strain rate and the vector velocity with the addition of fly ash makes it suitable to utilize with OB material. Mathematical expression presented in this paper provides a reliable prediction of factor of safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据