4.0 Article

ATAC-Seq-based Identification of Extrachromosomal Circular DNA in Mammalian Cells and Its Validation Using Inverse PCR and FISH

期刊

BIO-PROTOCOL
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

BIO-PROTOCOL
DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4003

关键词

Circular DNA; eccDNA; ATAC-seq; Inverse PCR; FISH

类别

资金

  1. [R01 CA060499]
  2. [P30 CA044579]
  3. [T32 CA009109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of eccDNA from yeast to humans, particularly in cancer cells where oncogenes are amplified on eccDNA causing genomic instability. A new method independent of rolling circle amplification was developed by the research team, utilizing ATAC-seq and a Circle_finder algorithm to predict eccDNA, followed by validation through inverse PCR and FISH.
Recent studies from multiple labs including ours have demonstrated the importance of extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) from yeast to humans (Shibata et al., 2012; Dillon et al., 2015; Moller et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2017; Turner et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2020). More recently, it has been found that cancer cells obtain a selective advantage by amplifying oncogenes on eccDNA, which drives genomic instability (Wu et al., 2019; Kim et al, 2020). Previously, we have purified circular DNA and enriched the population using rolling circle amplification followed by high-throughput sequencing for the identification of eccDNA based on the unique junctional sequence. However, eccDNA identification by rolling circle amplification is biased toward small circles. Here, we report a rolling circle-independent method to detect eccDNA in human cancer cells. We demonstrate a sensitive and robust step-by-step workflow for finding novel eccDNAs using ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing) combined with a Circle_finder bioinformatics algorithm to predict the eccDNAs, followed by its validation using two independent methods, inverse PCR and metaphase FISH (Fluorescence in situ Hybridization).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据