4.6 Article

Particle sizing for flowing colloidal suspensions using flow-differential dynamic microscopy

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 17, 期 14, 页码 3945-3953

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sm02255a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle size is crucial for understanding the behavior of many modern products. While traditional sizing methods are hindered in turbid samples, differential dynamic microscopy (DDM) can measure diffusion and particle size without requiring a resolution of individual particles. However, flow effects often dominate diffusive dynamics in flowing samples, hindering particle sizing. Developing flow-DDM allows successful particle size measurements at higher flow speeds, decoupling flow from diffusive motion.
Particle size is a key variable in understanding the behaviour of the particulate products that underpin much of our modern lives. Typically obtained from suspensions at rest, measuring the particle size under flowing conditions would enable advances for in-line testing during manufacture and high-throughput testing during development. However, samples are often turbid, multiply scattering light and preventing the direct use of common sizing techniques. Differential dynamic microscopy (DDM) is a powerful technique for analysing video microscopy of such samples, measuring diffusion and hence particle size without the need to resolve individual particles while free of substantial user input. However, when applying DDM to a flowing sample, diffusive dynamics are rapidly dominated by flow effects, preventing particle sizing. Here, we develop flow-DDM, a novel analysis scheme that combines optimised imaging conditions, a drift-velocity correction and modelling of the impact of flow. Flow-DDM allows a decoupling of flow from diffusive motion that facilitates successful particle size measurements at flow speeds an order of magnitude higher than for DDM. We demonstrate the generality of the technique by applying flow-DDM to two separate microscopy methods and flow geometries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据