4.7 Article

Perturbation theory for solitons of the Fokas-Lenells equation: Inverse scattering transform approach

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.042203

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces perturbation theory based on the inverse scattering transform method for solitons described by an equation with inverse linear dispersion law and cubic nonlinearity. It explicitly expresses local and nonlocal integrals of motion in terms of scattering data and presents evolution equations for scattering data in the presence of a perturbation. The spectral distributions of the energy emitted by the soliton in the presence of a perturbation are calculated analytically for cases of linear damping and multiplicative noise.
We present perturbation theory based on the inverse scattering transform method for solitons described by an equation with the inverse linear dispersion law omega similar to 1/k, where omega is the frequency and k is the wave number, and cubic nonlinearity. This equation, first suggested by Davydova and Lashkin for describing dynamics of nonlinear short-wavelength ion-cyclotron waves in plasmas and later known as the Fokas-Lenells equation, arises from the first negative flow of the Kaup-Newell hierarchy. Local and nonlocal integrals of motion, in particular the energy and momentum of nonlinear ion-cyclotron waves, are explicitly expressed in terms of the discrete (solitonic) and continuous (radiative) scattering data. Evolution equations for the scattering data in the presence of a perturbation are presented. Spectral distributions in the wave number domain of the energy emitted by the soliton in the presence of a perturbation are calculated analytically for two cases: (i) linear damping that corresponds to Landau damping of plasma waves, and (ii) multiplicative noise which corresponds to thermodynamic fluctuations of the external magnetic field (thermal noise) and/or the presence of a weak plasma turbulence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据