4.7 Article

ZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Determination of Trace Hg(II), Pb(II), Cu(II), and Glucose

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 4026-4036

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c00379

关键词

ZnFe2O4; spinel; electrochemical detection; heavy metal ions; glucose

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51962032, 61704114, 51764049]
  2. Youth Innovative Talents Cultivation Fund, Shihezi University [KX01480109]
  3. Opening Project of the Research Center for Material Chemical Engineering Technology of Xinjiang Bingtuan [2017BTRC007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnFe2O4 spinel magnetic nanoparticles were successfully synthesized and utilized in electrochemical trace detection of Hg(II), Pb(II), Cu(II), and glucose. The modified electrodes showed excellent performance in terms of sensitivity, stability, and repeatability for heavy metal ions and nonenzymatic glucose detection.
ZnFe2O4 (ZFO) spinel magnetic nanoparticles with a small particle size (11.2 nm) and large specific surface area (54.1 m(2)/g) are synthesized by a one-step hydrothermal method without the calcination process. ZFO-modified electrodes are first utilized for the simultaneous electrochemical trace detection of Hg(II), Pb(II), and Cu(II), which show an outstanding linear response for Hg(II), Pb(II), and Cu(II), and the limit of detection (LOD) is 1.61, 7.38, and 12.03 nM, respectively. Meanwhile, ZFO-modified electrodes exhibit excellent repeatability [relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.785%], reproducibility (RSD of 0.896%), stability (RSD of 3.240%), and anti-interference analysis, which is successfully applied to the real water environment. Moreover, the ZFO-modified electrode also exhibits a high sensitivity of 1160 mu A mM(-1) cm(-2) and LOD of 0.8 mu M for glucose. These results indicate that ZFO nanoparticles as a promising modified electrode material will be potentially applied in the field of electrochemical sensors for heavy metal ions and nonenzymatic glucose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据