4.4 Article

A methodology for carbamate posttranslational modification discovery and its application in Escherichia coli

期刊

INTERFACE FOCUS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0028

关键词

carbamylation; carbamate trapping; post-translational modification

类别

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2016-017]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/S015132/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/S015132/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide can influence cell phenotypes through modulating signalling pathways and regulating various cellular processes. The carbamate post-translational modification (PTM) on proteins, formed by CO2 interacting with neutral amines, may be more widespread in biology than previously thought, suggesting it as a broadly relevant mechanism for CO2-protein interactions.
Carbon dioxide can influence cell phenotypes through the modulation of signalling pathways. CO2 regulates cellular processes as diverse as metabolism, cellular homeostasis, chemosensing and pathogenesis. This diversity of regulated processes suggests a broadly conserved mechanism for CO2 interactions with diverse cellular targets. CO2 is generally unreactive but can interact with neutral amines on protein under normal intracellular conditions to form a carbamate post-translational modification (PTM). We have previously demonstrated the presence of this PTM in a subset of protein produced by the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana. Here, we describe a detailed methodology for identifying new carbamate PTMs in an extracted soluble proteome under biologically relevant conditions. We apply this methodology to the soluble proteome of the model prokaryote Escherichia coli and identify new carbamate PTMs. The application of this methodology, therefore, supports the hypothesis that the carbamate PTM is both more widespread in biology than previously suspected and may represent a broadly relevant mechanism for CO2-protein interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据