4.6 Review

Rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation

期刊

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 682-692

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1930137

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; Rate control strategy; Electrophysiology; arrhythmias

资金

  1. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [IFKSURP-000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cardiac arrhythmia associated with higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Rate control is one of the strategies for managing AF, aiming to improve symptoms and quality of life, although its effectiveness in preventing disease progression and reducing symptoms in highly symptomatic patients is limited. Despite being widely used, there are still debates regarding the use of rate control as first line management for all patients with AF.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the main cardiac arrhythmias associated with higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. AF can cause adverse symptoms and reduced quality of life. One of the strategies for the management of AF is rate control, which can modulate ventricle rate, alleviate adverse associated symptoms and improve the quality of life. As primary management of AF through rate control or rhythm is a topic under debate, the purpose of this review is to explore the rationale for the rate control approach in managing AF by considering the guidelines, recommendations and determinants for the choice of rate control drugs, including beta blockers, digoxin and non- dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers for patients with AF and other comorbidities and atrioventricular nodal ablation and pacing. Despite the limitations of rate control treatment, which may not be effective in preventing disease progression or in reducing symptoms in highly symptomatic patients, it is widely used for almost all patients with atrial fibrillation. Although rate control is one of the first line management of all patient with atrial fibrillation, several issues remain debateable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据