4.2 Article

Dietary patterns and sarcopenia in a Chinese population

期刊

ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 245-252

出版社

H E C PRESS, HEALTHY EATING CLUB PTY LTD
DOI: 10.6133/apjcn.202106_30(2).0009

关键词

dietary patterns; sarcopenia; Principal Component Analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that individuals with a dietary pattern mainly consisting of coarse cereals and vegetables had a 63.0% reduction in the risk of sarcopenia. Therefore, the dietary pattern of coarse cereals and vegetables is negatively correlated with sarcopenia and may reduce the risk of sarcopenia.
Background and Objectives: Malnutrition is implicated as a key modifiable risk factor for sarcopenia. As such, a dietary pattern analysis, rather than an analysis of single food items or nutrients, may provide insights into the comprehensive contribution of diet and nutrition to the risk of sarcopenia. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between main dietary patterns and sarcopenia. Methods and Study Design: A total of 591 participants aged over 40 years were included in this cross-sectional study. A validated food-frequency questionnaire was used to assess their dietary intake, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify the main dietary patterns. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to explore the associations between their main dietary patterns and the risk of sarcopenia. Results: This study identified 56 cases of sarcopenia, equating to an overall detection rate of 9.48%. The PCA revealed four major dietary patterns among the participants: coarse cereals and vegetables; beverages and animal organs; poultry, fish and shrimp; and fruits and pasta. After adjusting for age, sex, physical activity and smoking, individuals with the coarse cereals and vegetables dietary pattern had a 63.0% reduction in the risk of sarcopenia. Conclusions: The coarse cereals and vegetables dietary pattern is negatively correlated with sarcopenia, and may reduce the risk of sarcopenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据