4.0 Article

Metal Oxide/Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Catalysts Enables Highly Efficient CO2 Electroreduction

期刊

TRANSACTIONS OF TIANJIN UNIVERSITY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 269-277

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12209-021-00287-7

关键词

Metal oxide; Nitrogen-doped carbon; Interface effect; CO2 reduction reaction

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China
  2. Changyi Hydrogen Industrial Technology Fund
  3. [2016YFB0600901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis of metal oxide/nitrogen-doped carbon compounds enhances the activity of CO2 reduction reaction and promotes the generation of CO and H2 as primary products. The efficiency and current density of the metal oxide/nitrogen-doped carbon compounds are higher than those of nitrogen-doped carbon alone. The interaction between metal oxides and carbon facilitates the formation of defect sites, particularly imine-type nitrogen, enhancing the adsorption of key reaction intermediates and promoting the CO2 reduction reaction.
The metal oxide/nitrogen-doped carbon (NC) compounds zirconium oxide/NC (ZrO2/NC) and cerium oxide/NC (CeO2/NC) were synthesized via the pyrolysis of polyaniline on the metal oxide surface. The characterization of the ZrO2/NC and CeO2/NC catalysts showed more active CO2 reduction reaction activity than that of NC catalyst without metal oxide. Gas chromatography analysis revealed that CO and H-2 were the primary products, and no liquid-phase products were detected via proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy or high-performance liquid chromatography. The maximum Faraday efficiency of ZrO2/NC reached 90% at - 0.73 V (vs. RHE), with the current density of CO at 5.5 mA/cm(2); this Faraday efficiency value was higher than that of NC (41%), with the current density of CO at 3.1 mA/cm(2). The interaction between the metal oxide and carbon allowed the efficient formation of defect sites, especially imine-type nitrogen, strengthening the adsorption of the key reaction intermediate CO2 center dot- and thus promoting the CO2 reduction reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据