4.7 Review

High-throughput phenotyping: Breaking through the bottleneck in future crop breeding

期刊

CROP JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 633-645

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.015

关键词

High-throughput phenotyping; Crop breeding; Crop phenomics; Phenotyping platform; Data analysis

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100101-18, 2020YFD1000904-1-3]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601216, 31770397]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662019QD053, 2662020ZKPY017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rapid development of genetic analysis techniques and crop population size, phenotyping has become the bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Breakthrough in this area requires phenomics, accurate and high-throughput acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes at different levels. High-throughput phenotyping platforms have shown promising applications in stress response and yield assessment, but there are still challenges to be addressed.
With the rapid development of genetic analysis techniques and crop population size, phenotyping has become the bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Breaking through this bottleneck will require phenomics, defined as the accurate, high-throughput acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes during crop growth at organism-wide levels, ranging from cells to organs, individual plants, plots, and fields. Here we offer an overview of crop phenomics research from technological and platform viewpoints at various scales, including microscopic, ground-based, and aerial phenotyping and phenotypic data analysis. We describe recent applications of high-throughput phenotyping platforms for abiotic/biotic stress and yield assessment. Finally, we discuss current challenges and offer perspectives on future phenomics research. (C) 2021 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据