4.7 Article

Determinants of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older Irish adults

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 847-853

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afv090

关键词

vitamin D; older adults; supplements; older people

资金

  1. Mercer's Institute for Research on Ageing
  2. Irish Department of Agriculture, Food the Marine
  3. Health Research Board
  4. Department for Employment and Learning Northern Ireland under its Cross-Border Research and Development Programme: 'Strengthening the all-Island Research Base'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: we aimed to investigate the determinants of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in older Irish adults and in particular to examine the effect of supplement use and surrogate markers of sun exposure. Methods: subjects were non-institutionalised community dwelling Irish adults aged over 60 years who were participants of a large cross-sectional study comprising three disease defined cohorts. Serum 25(OH)D was measured by liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy. Associations between 25(OH)D and potential confounders were explored in forward regression models in each cohort. Results: the three cohorts comprised 1895, 1233 and 1316 participants (respective mean ages 70.1, 71.0 and 80.4 years). Statistical models explained between a fifth to a third of the variation in 25(OH)D. Supplement use and global solar radiation were positive predictors of 25(OH)D in all cohorts whereas the only universal negative predictor was body mass index. Supplement use was associated with a mean increase in 25(OH)D of between 21.4 and 35.4 nmol/l. The other main predictors varied by cohort but included sun holiday travel, enjoyment of sunshine when outside, use of vitamin D fortified milk, smoking, oily fish and egg consumption and physical frailty. Conclusion: supplement use was the most important determinant of vitamin D status. Vitamin D fortified milk and spending time in the sun, even in the oldest old may also be useful strategies to improve 25(OH)D.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据