4.5 Review

Mitochondrial dynamics, mitophagy and biogenesis in neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury

期刊

FEBS LETTERS
卷 592, 期 5, 页码 812-830

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.12943

关键词

biogenesis; brain injury; fission; fusion; mitochondria; mitophagy; neonatal

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council [MR/N013700/1]
  2. King's College London, MRC Doctoral Training Partnership in Biomedical Sciences
  3. Frimurarna Barnhusdirektionen Foundation
  4. ERANET (MICRO-MET, EU and research councils in Europe) [VR2014-7551]
  5. Biochemical Society Summer Fellowship [DCRB170512081]
  6. Medical Research Council/King's Health Partners [MC_PC_15031]
  7. SPARKS [15KCL05]
  8. Swedish Medical Research Council [VR2012-3500, VR 2012-2992]
  9. ALF-LUA [ALFGBG426401, ALFGBG-432291]
  10. Swedish Brain Foundation [FO2015-0094, FO2015-0190]
  11. Byggmastare Olle Engkvist Foundation
  12. Wilhelm & Martina Lundgren Foundation
  13. Ahlen Foundation
  14. Torsten Soderberg Foundation [M98/15]
  15. MRC [1935843, MC_PC_15031] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_15031] Funding Source: researchfish
  17. Action Medical Research [2485] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, resulting from asphyxia during birth, affects 2-3 in every 1000 term infants and depending on severity, brings about life-changing neurological consequences or death. This hypoxic-ischaemia (HI) results in a delayed neural energy failure during which the majority of brain injury occurs. Currently, there are limited treatment options and additional therapies are urgently required. Mitochondrial dysfunction acts as a focal point in injury development in the immature brain. Not only do mitochondria become permeabilised, but recent findings implicate perturbations in mitochondrial dynamics (fission, fusion), mitophagy and biogenesis. Mitoprotective therapies may therefore offer a new avenue of intervention for babies who suffer lifelong disabilities due to birth asphyxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据