3.8 Article

Understanding Cultural Preferences for Social Robots: A Study in German and Arab Communities

期刊

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3439717

关键词

Human-robot interaction; social robots; cross-cultural study; technology acceptance; cultural robotics

类别

资金

  1. Arab-German Young Academy of Sciences and Humanities (AGYA) - German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the impact of cultural differences on the acceptance and design preferences of social robots, revealing varying preferences not only across cultures, but also within countries with similar cultural backgrounds. The study shows a nuanced picture of the influence of previously identified culturally variable factors on perceptions of social robots.
This article presents a study of cultural differences affecting the acceptance and design preferences of social robots. Based on a survey with 794 participants from Germany and the three Arab countries of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, we discuss how culture influences the preferences for certain attributes. We look at social roles, abilities and appearance, emotional awareness and interactivity of social robots, as well as the attitude toward automation. Preferences were found to differ not only across cultures, but also within countries with similar cultural backgrounds. Our findings also show a nuanced picture of the impact of previously identified culturally variable factors, such as attitudes toward traditions and innovations. While the participants' perspectives toward traditions and innovations varied, these factors did not fully account for the cultural variations in their perceptions of social robots. In conclusion, we believe that more real-life practices emerging from the situated use of robots should be investigated. Besides focusing on the impact of broader cultural values such as those associated with religion and traditions, future studies should examine how users interact, or avoid interaction, with robots within specific contexts of use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据