4.8 Article

Declining diversity of wild-caught species puts dietary nutrient supplies at risk

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf9967

关键词

-

资金

  1. Columbia University Dean's Diversity Fellowship
  2. New York Community Trust Edward Prince Goldman Scholarship in Science
  3. Conservation, Food and Health Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the impact of declining biodiversity on nutrient supplies, particularly focusing on compensation, trophic dynamics, and functional diversity. The results show that when small sedentary species compensate for declines in large migratory species, there is an increase in fatty acid supplies but a decrease in zinc and iron supplies. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering biodiversity's essential role in sustaining nutritional benefits for the global population dependent on wild foods.
Although biodiversity loss adversely influences a variety of ecosystem functions, how declining wild food diversity affects nutrient supplies for people is poorly understood. Here, we analyze the impact of declining biodiversity on nutrients supplied by fish using detailed information from the Peruvian Amazon, where inland fisheries provide a critical source of nutrition for many of the region's 800,000 people. We found that the impacts of biodiversity loss on nutrient supplies depended on compensation, trophic dynamics, and functional diversity. When small sedentary species compensated for declines in large migratory species, fatty acid supplies increased, while zinc and iron supplies decreased. In contrast, the probability of failing to maintain supplies or nutrient supply risk increased when species were nutritionally unique. Our results show that trait-based regulations and public health polices need to consider biodiversity's vital role in sustaining nutritional benefits for over 2 billion people dependent on wild foods across the globe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据