4.8 Review

Lessons from a pandemic for systems-oriented sustainability research

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd8988

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation Integrated Socio-Ecological Systems Program [1924148]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1924148] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review points out the current issues in the research on the environmental impacts of COVID-19, mainly the lack of comprehensive consideration of complex interactions and societal factors, which may lead to erroneous conclusions. The lack of a systems perspective in environmental research reflects a broader challenge, and researchers can better incorporate systems perspectives by taking practical steps.
This review examines research on environmental impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from a systems-oriented sustainability perspective, focusing on three areas: air quality and human health, climate change, and production and consumption. The review assesses whether and how this COVID-19-focused research (i) examines components of an integrated system; (ii) accounts for interactions including complex, adaptive dynamics; and (iii) is oriented to informing action. It finds that this research to date has not comprehensively accounted for complex, coupled interactions, especially involving societal factors, potentially leading to erroneous conclusions and hampering efforts to draw broader insights across sustainability-relevant domains. Lack of systems perspective in COVID-19 research reflects a broader challenge in environmental research, which often neglects societal feedbacks. Practical steps through which researchers can better incorporate systems perspectives include using analytical frameworks to identify important components and interactions, connecting frameworks to models and methods, and advancing sustainability science theory and methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据