4.7 Article

A Single Pulse Study of a Millisecond Pulsar PSR J0621+1002

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 913, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf937

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12041304, 11988101, 12041306]
  2. National SKA Program of China [2020SKA0120100]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [m2017YFA0402600]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. 201* Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China for Flexibly Fetching in Upscale Talents, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M681758]
  6. Operation, Maintenance and Upgrading Fund for Astronomical Telescopes and Facility Instruments from the Ministry of Finance of China (MOF)
  7. Key Lab of FAST, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radio observations of the millisecond pulsar PSR J0621+1002 were conducted using the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope, revealing periodic pulse intensity modulations and fluctuation spectra with distinct peaks for different pulse components. Single pulse analysis classified pulses into two categories, but focusing on bright pulses did not improve timing precision.
We present radio observation of a millisecond pulsar PSR J0621+1002 using the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope. The pulsar shows periodic pulse intensity modulations for both the first and the third pulse components. The fluctuation spectrum of the first pulse component has one peak of 3.0 +/- 0.1 pulse periods, while that of the third pulse component has two diffused peaks of 3.0 +/- 0.1 and 200 +/- 1 pulse periods. The single pulse timing analysis is carried out for this pulsar and the single pulses can be divided into two classes based on the post-fit timing residuals. We examined the achievable timing precision using only the pulses in one class or bright pulses. However, the timing precision improvement is not achievable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据